The Wall Street Journal (the best newspaper in the United States with the Hartford Courant and the New London Day following close behind in the CR’s ranking of national newspapers) took on the compensation of college football coaches. The fiscal message from the Journal was that two programs have a “saner approach” to college football—Utah and BYU.

That’s right. The rest of the world is supposed to take lessons from Utah. Does that include polygamy?

The two major football programs in Utah, Brigham Young University and the University of Utah, won a combined 20 games last season. BYU’s Bronco Mendenhall, whose team finished 11-2 and earned a No. 14 ranking, earned no more than $1 million, while Utah coach Kyle Whittingham (9-4) earned about $680,000. Their combined pay is less than at least two dozen of their major college coaching peers earn by themselves.

Their secret is a philosophy that revolves around building up-to-date facilities, finding up-and-coming coaches and holding the line on compensation. “We know we’re not going to be able to compete for the highest-paid coaches,” says Tom Holmoe, BYU’s athletic director. “But I’m not convinced that they’re the best.”

Advertisement: Story continues below



Let’s be blunt, does BYU or Utah face the kind of coaches who stalk the sidelines in the Big 10, Big 12, ACC or SEC? Of course not. You can get away with gambling on younger coaches in a leagues with a greater margin of error. It is analogous to minor league sports—what works in Utah may not work everywhere else.

Just because Utah is immune from the workings of the free market doesn’t mean the rest of college football can ignore it. Coaches are just as egocentric as an office worker who would quit his job for more pay. You can’t change human nature.

These minor programs out West face a dilemma due to limited resources—hire more expensive coaches or build better facilities.

But is being poor necessarily “saner?”

Why should Alabama or Ohio State be insane for paying coaches what the market will bear?

If I didn’t know better, I’d have thought I was reading something from the New York Times instead of the journal of capitalism.

5 thoughts on “Coach pay debate (again)”

  1. Some universities can afford to pay college coaches the same amount a NFL coach receives and some can’t. The ones who can’t or the ones who complain.

  2. I remember when we hired Tony Franklin. All it took was 50K a year and a box of (stale) Krispy Kreme Jelly filled doughnuts, purchased second hand at a Tiger Mart convenience store.
    It didnt hurt that we massaged his ego by telling him he was the hottest up and coming OC in the Nation. And when Tuberville (inevitably) stepped down. He was a strong favorite to suceed him as HC at Auburn U. The man wept tears of joy as he signed his name and wrote the words “Fuck C.M. Newton” next to his signature.
    We told Paul Rhodes, that he had just won a 1 in 623,327 chance at a new Ford Truck. And that all he had to do was sign his name to collect. Now he is working for $6.29 as hour and living under the bleachers at the high school in Opelika and paying us rent for it. I know that some people probably think that this is cheating, but hell…..CPR didnt graduate high school, much less attend a college. He is some dumb, he makes Ed Orgeron look like a diamond sharp intellect. Someone has to exploit the less fortunate,,,,And it might as well be and Auburn Man!
    I know how to find the discount staffing… I am Auburn Man, King of the football fans…..

  3. WOW im the first BARNIE to post after 2 bammmers and it only took till the second one to BRING UP AUburn! AND you really want us to leave??? REALLY!?!

Comments are closed.