Good blog goes bad

O ne of the best football blogs around, MGOBLOG, has decided to go on the warpath against Alabama and Nick Saban. Unfortunately, the attacks have little to do with reality and more to do with a misunderstanding of the rules and business of major college football.

It began with a post calling Nick Saban a Snake Oil Salesman.



The post was repudiated by Pete HOLIDAY (edit: mea culpa. no excuse making that mistake twice!) also over at AOL’s fanhouse.



Numerous Alabama blogs commented on the situation including the influential Roll Bama Roll, the always on-top of things Tide Druid, and the interesting Third Saturday in Blogtober.



Today Brian Cook responded on his MGOBLOG.




Advertisement: Story continues below




Cook tries the play the aggrieved commentator, who was attacked while only trying to enlighten us fools from Alabama. He resents the attacks on his commentary, but then hurls insults—Alabama fans can’t think logically.

I don’t see any substantive points in the posts at Third Saturday in Blogtober, the Capstone Report, or Tide Druid and won’t address them directly. Since they’re all chock full of personal insults and insights into my “obsession” with a guy who coached Michigan’s third-biggest rival a decade ago, let me point out that each of the above-linked posts is a tribute to Alabama’s fine educational system and its constant focus on things like grammar and knowing how to use spell check. Gentlemen, there are typos and there’s you.

That’s actually a good criticism. I NEED to do better. I’ll put a copy editor on my shopping list for the coming months. However, Cook uses the old Internet standby of belittling an opponent in lieu of addressing the actual points.

Blogs aren’t the pages of the august New York Times. You can’t expect fans who blog because they care to be the expert wordsmiths of a real publication. The Internet in general, and blogs in particular are about the exchange of ideas—communication, discussion. Sure spelling and grammar are very important, but come on, Cook uses a cheap Internet trick instead of a crafting a substantive response.

Later, Cook goes on to attack the Roll Bama Roll post in more detail. One point was this exchange:

From Roll Bama Roll:And that is even if you don’t consider the fact that Wesley Neighbors may very well end up on a Bryant scholarship — since he is most likely not going to play in his first two years on campus anyway — and therefore he will not count against the scholarship limit this year. If that is indeed the case, as many expect, this class suddenly goes down to 29 players.

From MGOBLOG: Anyone on scholarship and on the football team counts against the 85 limit.

Not so. An academic scholarship is treated differently. A player only counts against the 85 limit when they play. So it isn’t an immediate mark against the 85. Additionally, as long as Neighbors doesn’t play during the first year, he doesn’t count against the limit, per NCAA rule 15.5.1.2 Football or Basketball, Varsity Competition. In football or basketball, a student-athlete who was recruited by the awarding institution and who receives institutional financial aid (as set forth in Bylaw 15.02.4.1) granted without regard in any degree to athletics ability does not have to be counted until the student athlete engages in varsity intercollegiate competition (as opposed to freshman, B-team, subvarsity, intramural or club competition) in those sports. For this provision to be applicable, there shall be on file in the office of the athletics director certification by the faculty athletics representative, the admissions officer and the chair of the financial aid committee that the student’s admission and financial aid were granted without regard in any degree to athletics ability. (Revised: 1/16/93 effective 8/1/93, 1/11/94, 6/20/04)

Unless I’m reading that wrong, and I must confess I am not a lawyer or NCAA compliance expert, academic aid like the Bryant Scholarship doesn’t count against the 85 rule.

Cook goes on to show his outstanding vocabulary.



The fucking point is that fucking Alabama is going to kick kids off the fucking team for no fucking reason. The point is not that violating the NCAA’s made-up limit is evil. The NCAA limit is there because the NCAA would like you to not kick kids off the fucking team, but for various reasons the rule’s pretty easy to skate around. The issue is not 32 > 25. The issue is that 70 + 32 > 85.

The fucking point is the NCAA allows non-renewal of grants-in-aid. There are specific rules for that. And you don’t really know how many student athletes will be back next year. Additionally, your point the NCAA doesn’t want you kicking kids off the team is a very large assumption. If that were so, the scholarships would be for longer than one academic year.

A college coach can’t just toss players aside because he must recruit again next year. Do you think other college coaches wouldn’t use this against Saban? Of course they would.

9 Responses to “Good blog goes bad” Subscribe

  1. Bayoubamafan February 15, 2008 at 4:17 pm #

    Well everyone now knows that Bama is loading up with real players. And payback time is near, so I guess the cry babies or beginning to be heard from. I like the feeling! RTR

  2. Cliff February 15, 2008 at 5:01 pm #

    Excellent comeback, CR. I went to his site and read some of his vinegar, not to mention Nico’s remarks at RollBamaRoll. Wow! This guy has a lot of people up in arms. I think he’s comical, more like a joke that’s getting too much attention because it was told in front of the wrong people. Let him think what he wants, he thinks the Big10 is so high and mighty. He has blinders on and in the world of college football is a non-issue of mammoth proportions. His 15 minutes of almost fame should be over now. And I think I wrote a whole paragraph without any misspellings or typos, is that a record from one of us morons in Alabama? (And I didn’t have to resort to using spell check. Some people can spell, some can’t, and all the ones who can AREN’T from Michigan.)

  3. Adam February 16, 2008 at 2:03 am #

    Just a random email I decided to send:

    Sheer Genius‏
    From: Adam cook (adamfrombostonmass@hotmail.com)
    Sent: Sat 2/16/08 3:00 AM
    To: mgoblog@gmail.com

    Dear Mr. Peanut Butter and Jelly Sandwhich (did distant cousin Pushkin give you that name),

    What’s worse, knowing you’ll never defeat OSU for as long as your program remains in existence, currently having Richer Rod guiding your pathetic team to absolutely nowhere (no, you guys will never be the team you once was during the Tom Brady tenure), or adding onto the humiliation by losing to Appalachian State?

    If I were you (which thankfully by 280lbs, I’m not), I’d worry more about my team’s current mediocrity, and less about whatever is going down on different ends of the country. Your team’s in a hole it can’t dig itself out of. Rich Rod will only add insult to injury, and I simply can’t wait for the disaster to worsen.

    I strongly suggest you seek professional help. Then again, if I had to stomach supporting a fan-base full of obese, hairy chested, jacked-up truck driving, slow talking, brain-dead, moronic human beings, I’d probably lose my sanity as well.

    Better you than the rest of the country.

    My favorite quote of all time (From an OSU fan): I wanted to be born apart of the maze and blue family, but I couldn’t simply because my mother and father weren’t siblings.

    http://img122.imageshack.us/img122/69/bo7ny.jpg

    PS: Roll Tide!

  4. willheath February 16, 2008 at 5:18 pm #

    That’s the august New York Times, folks, not the August edition. Capstone’s not playing around here with the college terminology.
    And I think I like it.

    wlh

  5. LDV February 18, 2008 at 6:01 pm #

    Since someone brought up beating your rival, how has Alabama done this decade against Auburn. Auburn has taken 7 since 2000.

    No, Michigan cannot beat Ohio State, but it appears that Alabama cannot beat Auburn.

  6. MaximumSam February 19, 2008 at 6:52 pm #

    You guys are arguing way past each other. MGoBlog is arguing that oversigning is generally scummy business, since it leaves teams to ax students athletes based solely on the athletic performance. Alabama fans say who cares, if they aren’t playing well, why would we want them on scholarship. I don’t know why said disagreement in viewpoint must lead to so many attacks, but I suppose that is life.

  7. Micah McLee March 28, 2010 at 8:11 pm #

    Never watched football, got a kick out of watching people watch it, but never got interested myself. Just surfing the web and I found this, and literally rolled on the floor laughing. I can’t get over how totally up in arms football fans get. Then I have to wonder what if all that energy was put use on something positive like helping a needy neighbor? No one I know who volunteers their time are anywhere near as obsessive about a piece of pigskin as you people. Get a life.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. » Snake Oil: More On Over-signing - February 16, 2008

    […] This, of course, is false. Take, for example, Bryant Scholarship players (the Bryant scholarship is given to sons and daughters of his former players), as demonstrated quite clearly by The Capstone Report (whose author continues to butcher my last name) by simply citing the NCAA rule. The gist of it is this: non-athletic scholarships don’t count until “the student athlete engages in varsity intercollegiate competition.” So, with all due respect to Mr. Cook, he needs to take another read through the NCAA Bylaws. […]

  2. The Great Oversigning Controversy | Bama Sports Report - June 13, 2008

    […] regarding our scholarship summary. After signing day, the fellows at mgoblog and a couple of Bama blogs got into a huge row. You’ll probably want to explore our friend’s hatred for coach […]

%d bloggers like this: